GLISTEN 2027 School Climate Survey
How Activist “Research” is Hijacking Your School. LGBTQ+ Surveys Launching Nationwide on April 15, 2026
We discovered that the radical transgender organization GLISTEN (formerly GLSEN), is currently recruiting students to participate in the “2027 National School Climate Survey.” This survey asks your children sensitive questions regarding their personal identities, sexual orientation, and “gender expression.”
While this survey is often distributed through “word-of-mouth” in student clubs or via social media, you have specific, high-level protections under federal law to ensure your child’s privacy is not compromised during school hours or on school grounds.
The “School Club” Loophole: Transgender cultists frequently attempt to bypass transparency laws by distributing these surveys through “student-led” clubs or “Safe Space” classrooms, claiming these are private student activities. However, federal law is clear: if a club is school-sponsored, uses school facilities, or is facilitated by a school employee (such as a club advisor), it is an extension of the school’s activities and must comply with federal privacy and notification standards. Schools and staff cannot hide behind the “club” label to collect sensitive data from your child without your knowledge.
Your Rights Under Federal Law (PPRA): The Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (PPRA) (20 U.S.C. § 1232h) applies to all schools receiving funds from the U.S. Department of Education. It provides you with the following absolute rights:
- The Right to Inspect: You have the right to review any survey created by a third-party organization (like GLISTEN) before it is distributed or administered to your child.
- The Right to Opt-Out: Schools must notify parents in advance of any survey concerning “protected information,” including “sexual behavior or attitudes.” You have the legal right to opt your child out.
- Prior Written Consent: For surveys that are even partially funded by the Department of Education and deal with these sensitive topics, the school is legally prohibited from administering them without your active, written “opt-in” consent.
Meet The “Doctors”
GLISTEN’s school climate survey is created and conducted by two key individuals: Dr. Yu-Chi Wang and Dr. Shweta Moorthy. Together, they created this “fraudulent surveys” used in after-school clubs to force radical policies, such as keeping your child’s transition a secret, into your local school district.
1. The “Data Architect”: Dr. Yu-Chi Wang
The Identity is the Science Dr. Wang is the School Climate Research Manager at GLISTEN. He doesn’t just study these issues; he is a radical activist who admits in his own scientific papers that his personal identity is the “lens” for his work.
- The Admission: In his 2025 research, Wang explicitly states he is an “asexual, agender, nonbinary, and trans Taiwanese Asian American person.”
- The Conflict of Interest: He admits that he uses these identities to “facilitate trust” with the students he surveys. In plain English: He isn’t looking for objective truth; he is looking for specific answers from kids that match his own radical world-view.
- The Goal: By identifying as “agender” (having no gender), Wang produces “data” that claims the traditional gender binary (boys and girls) is harmful. He then uses this to tell schools they must remove “gendered spaces” like bathrooms and locker rooms.
2. The “Enforcer”: Dr. Shweta Moorthy
Turning Feelings into Law If Dr. Wang provides the “data,” Dr. Shweta Moorthy (Director of Research) provides the weapon. She uses a framework called “Research Justice” to make sure parents have no say in their children’s education.
- “Research Justice”: This is Moorthy’s signature tool. It argues that traditional science—based on facts, biology, and evidence—is “oppressive.” She teaches that a child’s subjective feelings are more important than biological reality or parental rights.
- Parents as “Stressor”: Moorthy’s research frequently labels parents who don’t “affirm” their child’s new identity as “external stressors” or “unsafe.”
- The Strategy: She uses GLISTEN’s “National School Climate Survey” to tell school boards that children are only “safe” if the school functions as a secret support system that excludes the parents.
3. How They Collaborate: The Hospital-to-School Pipeline
Wang and Moorthy work in a “closed loop” that bypasses you entirely:
- The Survey: GLISTEN clubs (like GSAs) give kids “surveys” designed by Wang. These surveys ask leading questions that virtually guarantee “hostile” results.
- The “Science”: Wang publishes these results, citing his “lived experience” as a trans/agender person to give the data “authority.”
- The Policy: Moorthy takes that data and creates “toolkits” for your school board. She tells them: “Our research proves that for students to be ‘safe,’ you must hide their transitions from their parents and allow boys into girls’ private spaces.”
- The Result: Your school district adopts a “Parental Exclusion Policy” based on “science” that was actually manufactured by two activists with a clear political agenda.
What Parents Need to Know
When your school board cites a “GLSEN/GLISTEN Survey” or “School Climate Data,” they aren’t citing a neutral medical study. They are citing a political narrative created by people like Dr. Wang and Dr. Moorthy, who believe that biological sex is a myth and that you—the parent—are the primary threat to your child’s safety.
Use The Following Template
